KSPACe  

KSPACe >
Attorney General, Kansas >
Attorney General--Opinions 2009 >

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1984/3083

Full metadata record

DC FieldValueLanguage
contributor.authorKansas. Office of the Attorney General-
date.accessioned2010-03-30T18:09:21Z-
date.available2010-03-30T18:09:21Z-
date.issued2009-10-28-
identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1984/3083-
descriptionAn opinion requested by Catherine P. Logan, City Attorney for Junction City. The inquire was whether the Kansas Open Meetings Act (KOMA) is violated when a member of an agency or body responds to an email or electronic communication and copies all or a majority of the other members. The situation you describe, in which members of a body or agency receive an email from a constituent and one member replies to that constituent, but also shares both the original message and comments with the other members, raises questions as to whether a "meeting," as defined by KOMA has occurred."en
format.extent23865 bytes-
format.mimetypetext/richtext-
language.isoEnglish (United States)-
subject.lcshAttorneys general's opinions - Kansasen
subject.lcshKansas. Office of the Attorney General - Periodicalsen
titleAttorney General Opinion No. 2009-22en
title.alternativeKansas Attorney General Opinions 2009-22en
title.alternativeOpinions of the Attorney Generalen
typeen
Appears in Collections:Attorney General--Opinions 2009

Files in This Item:

File SizeFormat
2009-22logan.rtf23KbRTFView/Open

Show simple item record

All items in KSPACe are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.

Feedback